When AI is your personal tutor with Sal Khan of Khan Academy

Yeah. Hello and welcome to How I Built This Lab. I'm Guy Raj. The pandemic changed education forever. In just a few days, schools around the world had to move online. Teachers began teaching on Zoom, schools started issuing students laptops. And platforms like Google Classroom became indispensable.

Even with kids back in the classroom now, school is much more digital now than it was before 2020. And our guest today says that an even bigger change is on the way, a revolution that could transform the way kids learn even more than the pandemic did. SalCon has been on the show before. He's the founder of Khan Academy, an online teaching nonprofit. That went from pixelated YouTube videos To a massive platform with hundreds of free tutorials in dozens of languages.

and tens of millions of users every month. Right now, Sal and his team are working on a new learning platform. It's called Conmigo, which uses the generative AI technology behind OpenAI's chat GPT to help students with their schoolwork. And the people at Khan Academy think that Con Migo could act as a personal tutor for every student. and a teaching assistant for every educator, but we'll get there. First, let's go back to 2020 and the early months of the pandemic when Khan Academy saw millions of new students begin to use its materials. You know, the the spike was interesting because that first week where you had global shutdowns in the US and other places, we talked about it last time, our traffic went from about thirty million learning minutes per day to about ninety million learning minutes per day, pretty much within that week. Wow.

What was interesting is You fast forward a couple of months As we know, a lot of school systems start to figure out how to do Online schooling. Yeah. And then we saw things actually normalize in but maybe in a very abnormal way.

Mainly because I think people started to have screen time fatigue. And I think during the pandemic people had A you know what, if we can just kinda pretend like we're going through the motions of school, let's call it a day. And uh And because of that people weren't looking to

Improve necessarily. They were just looking to tread water. Hm. What did you find? I mean, as you know, I mean there have been studies over the past two years comparing students pre and post pandemic, right? Their standardized test scores and It's clear that student performance in both uh reading and math fell significantly. Math I think even more than reading. Have you found that that Con Academy helped keep students on track during the pandemic, or or is that something you even measure?

Oh yeah, this is something we've been keeping a very close eye on and we've The thing I always point out first of all is that the numbers were not good pre-pandemic. Yeah. What we saw We did uh an FK study in the first full school year, uh the twenty twenty-twenty one school year, and then we did another one in twenty one, twenty two. And what we saw in twenty twenty one Is that the students who

Put in an average of Fifteen minutes. on Khan Academy a week in a school setting. They actually saw no covet learning loss. And that students who put in

Thirty to sixty minutes. They accelerated almost forty percent faster than pre-pandemic norms. And it and it's not A mystery. They're just getting more practice at their level with more feedback. And those that are supporting them, their teachers, are getting more information about where the students really are and maybe can adjust their lessons a bit based on that.

Tell me about what you I mean, you must have learned And and I think now this is probably the third time I'm talking to you since the pandemic started and And each time I've talked to you, it's so clear how much you're you were learning in real time and how much you've learned From what happened so to the overwhelming numbers of people coming to

Con Academy. Tell me how it sort of fundamentally changed. How you guys operate. I think it did a bunch of things that

we always wanted to do, but this just accelerated things. We always wanted better ways for students to address gap that they might have. The fashionable term now in education circles is unfinished learning. Yeah. We all thought that the pandemic was only going to affect the school system, maybe through that first summer.

And by the time you go back to school even then there would be some damage done back to school twenty twenty. I mean now we know how delusional that was. Yeah. Uh but we started creating these back to get ready for grade level courses, which essentially cover all of the prerequisites that a student needs in order to be ready for their grade level work. And we saw that That was very popular. So so that was accelerated. We created another sister nonprofit called schoolhouse dot world. We saw s how much people were leaning on Khan Academy, but we also saw that there was a gap of getting real human support.

And so the utopian idea was, well, what if they could get real h human support for free based on volunteers out there on the internet? And then as we get to the tail end of the pandemic, and as we all know, people had very mixed feelings about Covid learning. Most people did not think it was, you know, spending time on video conference for several hours a day was a good thing. Yeah. we felt the need to show that there's a way to do this well. And so another sister organization, we have a a lab school that I help start that's Literally in the same building as Khan Academy. Uh, but we said could we create an online version of this that can do

Online schooling. But do it well. Don't do it so it's just students listening to lectures on Zoom for hours a day. Yeah. When people are on video conference together, make it interactive, make it Socratic. And then

Use personalized learning. And other tools for students to get more asynchronous support, but always feel connected to a community. So we started working on a lot of things like that as well. All right, let's go now back to not that long ago, back to the the summer of twenty twenty two. You got an email.

From Sam Altman. at OpenAI. And uh he said they said he sent you out and said, Hey, we've got this thing we're working on and we would like you to check it out.

So you did. Tell me what happened. Tell me the story. Yeah, it's interesting almost on a daily basis we get emails from folks saying, Hey, you have an interesting technology. We would love to partner with Khan Academy And most of the time, you know, we look at it, we're like, Oh, you know, it looks intriguing, but we just don't have the bandwidth. But I obviously knew of Sam and Greg and had

deep respect for what the many of the things that they've done in their lives. And I have been watching what's been happening with generative AI for the last, let's call it three to five years. I didn't really think it had a place at Con Academy'cause GPT two and three were good at Writing.

convincing text, but it it really had no grounding in factual knowledge. 'Cause I'm like I'm I'm happy to to meet with y'all. I'm just curious what y'all are up to. Yeah. And They said, Hey, we're going through our first training run of GPT four. which obviously is now out, but back then that was very confidential. And

We want to launch it with a small number of partners that we think can show a social positive use case'cause we think it's going to change things. Mm-hmm. I was skeptical at first because I was Familiar with GPT three? About two weeks later I got another email from both of them saying, Hey, when we're done, can we show you a demo? Sure.

So they put up an AP biology question on on the chat and the AI answered it correctly. I'm like, Oh, this is pretty interesting. And then I said. Ask it to explain its reasoning. And it explained it. It gave the right answer. And then I said, Explain why the other choices aren't correct. It gave that. And then I asked

Can you create Ten more questions just like that one. And it did. And as far as I could inspect, they were pretty good. That's when I started getting getting the goosebumps. I'm like, okay, this is this is different. Yeah. And then they gave us access that weekend and I spent hours with it. And it was doing very well, although it definitely had some issues. We realized pretty quickly that you couldn't just have it generate a ton of questions and just put students in front of it. It would make mistakes. Especially in those early days, it was pretty still pretty bad at math. Yeah.

But at the same time we also we started to make it role play, roleplay as a tutor, role play as a character, role play, you know, do something in the style of someone else and That's when I started to To really say, wow, this really could be that holy grail that we've all been thinking about reading science fiction about for for decades. Of an AI that can actually emulate a human tutor.

Before we really dive into what you From from what I gather, Sal, I think Your initial reaction was the initial reaction that many people have, which is which was like Kind of

Terrified. I read a lot of science fiction and it it it was it was a moment In which I felt that all my science fiction reading had prepared me for. Uh, but you know, there were moments that even that first weekend where I was pushing a l few of the limits. Where I I asked at things like

Are there things that you think that you're not sharing with me? And it said yes. You get a little weirded out by that. I'm like, well, why aren't you sharing it with me? It says well it might offend you or it might scare you. And

It feels like you're talking to an alien. It feels like you're talking to a superintelligence. And I had to keep reminding myself I do understand how it works. I have a master's in computer science. I understand how large language models work. And I I started to say, Okay, I can get how If it's just modeling the natural thing to say of why you're not sharing a thought. It is. Why why don't you or I share a thought? It's because it might offend someone or it might scare them. So that's kind of what it was doing. But it was an otherworldly feeling and it was you know, we had signed a non disclosure agreement, so it was a very hard secret to keep.

Uh you know, every now and then I would go to dinner parties and I was like I wish I could tell you what The world is about to change. We're gonna take a quick break, but when we come back... How Sal and his team struggled with the shortcomings and the dangers of GPT. Stay with us, I'm Guy Raz, and you're listening to How I Built This Lab.

One more thing before we get back to the show, please make sure to click the follow button on your podcast app so you never miss a new episode of the show. And it's totally free. Welcome back to How I Built This Lab. I'm Guy Raz, and I'm speaking with Sal Khan, founder of Khan Academy. In 2022, Sao got early access to the large language model GPT 4 before ChatGPT was even released, and he was amazed by its potential. So you uh sort of get over your initial kind of, oh my god, and you start to see obviously.

a a huge potential here to kind of transform what you do, which is uh offering free education to people around the world. So what did you do next? I mean, the chat GPT wasn't going to be the exact right thing. Right fit.

for what you do, but you could build on that. on that foundation, right? That's right. The first thing we did is we signed an org white NDA and I said, Hey, how many folks in the organization can I get we give access to? And eventually we got about about forty or fifty folks in our organization to to get access to GPT four. Yeah, and even that, this was the first time that Khan Academy had to do a little bit of cloak and dagger type stuff. Folks at Apple are used to keeping secrets and things like that, but we're not used to keeping secrets and we we had to. I uh this is obviously very sensitive stuff.

And we immediately We had a hackathon, which was well timed, because then these forty or fifty folks were able to at least for a couple of weeks say, like, Okay, let's just let's just be generative here, no pun intended. Like what is possible? with this. And by the end of that two weeks we had some really cool demos. And then we started to have the internal debate of like okay, how aggressive do we get on this? What about bias? What about the math errors? What about hallucinations?

What about just the PR implications? People trust us, and if they see us leaning way forward on something that's not perfect, that's something that some people could be wary of. What does that do to our brand? What does that do to the trust that folks have? On the other side. folks were arguing, look, this is a transformational technology. This is one of these things where It's either going to allow us to magnify our impact by an order of magnitude, or it might make us irrelevant.

And so we we made a decision to say w you know, we have to keep moving forward, but we have to do it in a risk aware way and a risk mitigating way. Alright, I think it's fair to say that you are a true believer in this and your team basically Developed. An AI.

That you call conmigo. And so this is now I think in beta, but still integrated into Con Academy.

So tell me how how this works. What what is it? So first was the guardrails. Like what what in what context would we even feel comfortable doing this? And What's interesting is We were starting to do all this in earnest in September and October. Then end of November, chat GPT comes out.

And I remember the day that it came out. I slacked Greg Brockman at Open AI and I said Hey Greg, we're under NDA and I thought we weren't launching anything until March of twenty twenty three. What's this chat GPT thing? And Greg says it's it's nothing new. It's based on GPT 3.5, which had been out for many months already. No one really took note when they released GPT 3.5.

And OpenAI just decided to to publish a bunch of apps that use GPT three point five. One of them happened to be Chat GPT and And then being able to inter interface with the model in a chat interface. I think

Made everyone see Uh what the power of it was. And at first I was a little bummed. I was like, oh, this is gonna steal the thunder. I've been telling all my friends at dinner parties something something's big's coming in twenty twenty three. But then I was I think it was actually a blessing because as we know, chat GPT goes out there It amazes people, but it also scares people. And then immediately

It creates huge issues for education. Like kids are cheating using this. Right. You can you can type in an equation and it'll give you the answer. And you can write your essays. You can write your essays, right. Yeah. And that I think gave us more license at Khan Academy to say, look, the genie has out of the bottle with chat GPT. We need to double down on bringing a better version of out there out there that can mitigate all the risks and maximize the benefits. So we started saying, Well, you know, first, whatever we make shouldn't be for cheating. It should be for actually helping students learn. So with there's many things we're doing to make it Socratic, not just give you the answer. Two, it has to be accurate.

It's not okay if it's it doesn't know what seven plus four is. Yeah. It should it shouldn't hallucinate. And then we also were afraid of students misusing it or using it in some ways that might harm them or other folks. And just reassuring teachers and parents that they can keep track of what their students are doing with with this very powerful tool. And so that's why we made it so it logs all of the conversations. We have a second artificial intelligence that monitors conversations with the main artificial intelligence. And if any of those conversations go into a

A gray zone. Uh, then it actively notifies the parents and the teachers that hey, you should take a look at this conversation. And then we're continuing to add a whole bunch of other things, things where teachers can use it for lesson planning, we're adding memory to it, how teachers can essentially use it as a teaching assistant, get reports on what the students are up to. I I could go on. So essentially e the idea is, hey, If we can get every single kid a personal tutor

then it will have an impact on their academic performance. And this has actually been studied and measured. I know you you gave a TED talk back in March of of twenty twenty three and you cited a study that came out in the eighties basically that showed that when kids have one on one tutoring their scores and grades just skyrocket. Like you can turn an average student into an outstanding student, for example. That's a hundred percent right. If you want to become a great pianist, you're not sitting in a class of thirty with your piano and the person's lecturing you. If you're a great athlete, you have a coach who's

optimizing you, not just giving a lecture to thirty students and saying, Hey, you might want to improve your swim stroke in this way. And then who knows if you actually you actually do. So one on one tutoring's always been the gold standard. when we did mass public education, which was a very utopian idea two or three hundred years ago, but we we made compromises. We started batching students together, applying set standards, lectures to them. Some kids get it, some kids don't, even if you have a gap in your knowledge. Too bad. Move on to the next concept. And uh as you mentioned, Benjamin Bloom, nineteen eighty four, he articulated it well. He called it the two sigma problem.

two sigma sigma the symbol for standard deviation in in statistics. And a way to think about it, two sigma improvement, two standard deviation improvement is dramatic. It's some it's going from the fifth percentile to I think the ninety-fifth or ninety-sixth percentile. But he reason why he called it a problem was, well, how are you gonna give everyone everyone a tutor a one to one tutor? Yeah. And he he also in nineteen eighty four theorized, well, maybe you could emulate some aspects of that with technology. But I I I've been citing that study for many years in terms of what Khan Academy's trying to build. Essentially old Con Academy or base Con Academy trying to get to that first standard deviation and but now with the AI We can go to that second standard deviation.

So essentially the interface of if you who you know, if you're listening and you're familiar with the interface of of Khan Academy, let's say you get a math problem. And you can essentially click a little sort of eyeball robot icon in the corner and say, Hey I don't understand this problem. Can you help me? It it will not give you the answer. You can't say, Hey, can you solve this for me? It's essentially

You ask it to help you and then what happens? Yeah, and if you say, Give me the answer, say, Hey, I'm your tutor. I'm I'm here to help you. You need to learn here as I think a good tutor would do and I if say, okay, well give me a hint, it'll it'll say, Well, let's take a closer work. What what is the problem actually asking for? And if you say, Well, I think they're asking for this. If I got it right, yeah, I say well yeah, that's good intuition. Okay, so what's Where would you take that? Or let's say I say I think the next step is

X squared minus five. Like, okay, take a double look at that. Are you sure it's minus five? You know, pay attention to your to your uh signs. And One of the things we've done to make it more robust on the math side is When a student presents their math to the AI saying, Hey, I think this is the next step The AI

behind the scenes comes up with what it thinks are reasonable responses from the student. It doesn't share those with the student. Then it compares It's reasonable responses to what the student said, and if it gets something different. It'll tell the student, hey. I I'm getting something different. Can you explain your reasoning?

Which is very pedagogically strong. And so then if the student explains the reasoning, and it's a large language model, so it's very good at understanding when a student explains their reasoning. And sometimes you know, the AI will say, Okay, you know, now that I see what you did, you know, you might have missed that aspect of it. Or it might say, you know what, you got it right. I realized I made the mistake. Which we actually heard feedback from from students that they actually really like that. And once again, I think this is very human like.

This is what a human tutor would do. When I tutored I got started tutoring my cousins back in 2004, and this would happen all the time. My cousins do something. And I'd say, hey, um that's not what I got. Can you explain how you got that? And nine times out of ten, I was right. But one out one time out of ten, they were right. And I'm like, Oh, my bad, you're right. And so I I I think people really appreciate that. And this is now available. I mean it's it's it's

Totally a a feature of of the interface. Yeah, what we did is when we released it coincident with the GPT four launch in mid March of twenty twenty three. And we did a r a limited release pilot. Where

People had to go on a waiting list and then they had to give a donation. And the reason why they had to give a donation is This stuff isn't cheap. The computation costs You know, every interaction is going to like five thousand NVIDIA GPUs that are crunching on this. And so anyway, yeah, you know, we we have to pay open AI money which then pays Microsoft Azure money which then uses that money to go buy expensive NVIDIA chips. So that's That's something that we've had to grapple with because our mission statement is free world class education for anyone anywhere.

But um We have about ten thousand folks using it right now. Some in mainstream school settings And it's it's much more than just the tutoring interaction that I we just talked about, which in and of itself is powerful. But

We have activities that are standalone AI AI activities where uh students can talk to historical characters or literary characters they can get feedback on their college essays. They won't write the essay for them. But it can give them feedback. It can coach them to help them think of their college essay. It can act as a guidance counselor in in certain ways. It can act help teachers create lesson plans. Assessments. Uh and what we're seeing the feedback has been very, very positive. So

This summer we're hoping to make it a more broad release. Uh, so that we're expecting many tens of thousands of more folks are gonna sign up. Um There's a part of me That's also asking

Like am I not asking all the right questions. Am I not thinking of all the downstream consequences. I mean Obviously we're talking about Conmigo, but As you know, many school districts in the United States

have essentially blocked chat GPT from school-issued laptops. They've banned them from being used, right? I think a bunch of school districts all across the country. And so What is it that they they don't fully understand that you You know, or what is it that they're not seeing that if you could make the case to them that this is a mistake

What would you say? We we've shown Conmigo to many of these same districts. And Their general reaction has been in fact not general, all of their reactions has been

This is what we need. This is I guess a a a fair analogy might be What Con Academy is to YouTube is what Con Migo is to chat GPT or standard generative AI. Whereas we also know a lot of school districts ban YouTube. Even though YouTube has a lot of really good learning content on it. A lot of great stuff, but it also has a lot of stuff. A lot of crap. Yeah. A lot of crap. A lot of stuff that can students at minimum is gonna distract them and worst case is gonna put them into some kind of weird rabbit hole and mess with their head. So they banned it.

But Something like Khan Academy, where you can create curated safe environment, it's monitorable, et cetera. They feel like that's the thing. much more comfortable and and so when we showed them It's not cheating.

It's actually acting like a tutor. It provides oversight by adults. It can flag When uh students are getting into suspicious areas with the AI.

Like these are just the guardrails that we wanted. But I mean you you concede, and I guess y you'd have to, that there's nothing preventing a kid from using chat GPT. Too cheap. Nothing preventing. And so my best guess of of where, let's say, term papers or homework is going to have to evolve to Is especially in something like writing.

You're gonna have to do some in class writing. And that's a place where I think conmigo can be really useful. We're working on activities right now where a teacher can say, Hey I want all the students in the class right now to write a five paragraph essay about the following. And then on the student interface. Canmigo will say, hey, Mr. or Mrs. Smith just wants your thoughts on this thing. Let's work through this together. And then the students can work on it right there. And Conmigo won't do it for them, but can help assist them. You know, well, are you really answering the question that they're asking? Or do you have more data to back that up? And and simultaneously, Conmigo can tell the teacher, like, okay.

Guy is making a lot of progress, but Sal seems a little bit stuck. You might want to go walk up to him. You know, Mary has already finished the assignment and she's now going back to working on her math or something like that. Super useful for the teacher. And even for take home assignments, the teacher can say, I want you to do it on Conmigo. And the process is as important as the outcome, as we know it often is in writing. Yeah. And then if there's some student who goes to ChatGPT and just says, Chat GPT, write this essay for me and just copies and pastes it into Conmigo, Conmigo can tell the teacher like there was no process here. The S just showed up. I I see. I see. So Conmigo could be the interface too for for submitting assignments. It could be the interface, it could be the coach, and it can it really acts as a teaching assistant. Imagine every student having a teaching assistant and

The teaching assistant is working with every student and can report back to the teacher like, Yeah, I I worked with that kid. I know it's their thoughts, uh and I helped him a little bit, but it's mostly them. But one kid just showed up with an essay and really couldn't defend his argument. Let's take a second look at that. We're gonna take a quick break, but when we come back, more from Sal on the future of Con Migo and whether it could ever become a for-profit product. Stay with us, I'm Guy Raz, and you're listening to how I built this lab. Welcome back to How I Built This Lab. I'm Guy Roz and I'm talking with Sal Khan, founder of Khan Academy. They built a teaching AI called Con Migo that could become a pretty lucrative commercial product, but Con Academy

is a nonprofit. So, this is a business show, uh as you know, and so I I wanna ask you to put your business hat on for a moment,'cause we don't do many nonprofits on how I built this, and there are tons of ed tech companies out there. that make money. working with school districts, you know, Dreambox and all these other programs where you can schools are paying a fee for kids to use these products and Con Academy products are free to use. But

I wanna ask about Conmigo, I mean if this in fact Could be A tutor for every kid. and an interface with the teacher, giving the teacher feedback on the student's progress. It strikes me that this is something that you could license to schools that you could actually turn into.

a product. Obviously you're a nonprofit and you're mission driven, but is that something that you would consider Doing? So simple answer is yes, and we're we're kind of doing that a little bit of that already. Yeah, I was not to our team. We're not for profit, we have free in our mission, but still it costs

on the order of sixty, seventy million a year to run Khan Academy, both to you know, just our server costs are six, seven million dollars a year, and then obviously all of the engineers, et cetera. And Historically we've been primarily funded with philanthropy. Yeah. But with that said, about five years ago, we started going to school districts. Obviously, we've had a lot of what we call grassroots usage in classrooms, hundreds of thousands of teachers, but we said if we really want to reach all kids, we have to work formally with the districts. And we would go to the districts, we would show them our efficacy studies, but they said, look, for us to use this systemically inside of our district,

You have to give us support, training, integration with our rostering systems, district level dashboards. And that's where we said, Okay, to do all this bespoke work, someone has to Foot that bill. And um we we said Look.

We're not gonna charge you for all of this stuff that's funny with philanthropy. But at least cover some of the incremental costs here. And so to a lot of districts. And we now have about a million students in districts. where they're paying on the order of about ten dollars per student per year. to get all of these other things. So we are build we have built this enterprise muscle and it is starting to build a little bit of a flywheel of sustainability.

And to your point. on Conmigo, Conmigo has a very real marginal cost to it. Uh it costs on the order of let's call it ten to fifteen dollars per month. And so what all of these school districts that have come to us, we are talking to them of like, hey, we need to at least cover our computation costs. And then we do expect that the underlying computation costs are going to come down. And so we are having these conversations on our team right now of like, okay, right now it costs

Let's call it$10 per user per month just for the computation. We have to charge that. For Con Migo, not for base Con Academy. But let's say that cost goes down to a dollar per user per month. Do we just lower it to a dollar or do we lower it to two dollars and then we use that that incremental dollar to fund our R and D.

I mean I I look at this um the potential here, right, and what you've developed and the amount of money you've put into it already. And um but I wonder whether There's a world where you take a product like Conmigo. Which

If it's as revolutionary as it as it looks. Like it could be, I mean it can really change the face of education. Is there a world where That spun out into a for profit.

Business. There's always been this debate not at Khan Academy, but about Khan Academy, which it always confuses folks wh why we're a not for profit. You know, we scale, we're tech heavy. I live in the middle of Silicon Valley. Most of my friends are entrepreneurs or or VCs of of some kind. And there's a there's a Harvard Business School case about this should kind of kind of maybe be for profit or nonprofit. And To me.

The arguments for for profit have historically been access to talent, and access to capital. the the reasons to be nonprofit are you really can truly make your mission the bottom line. And I think there's a trust aspect of it as well. That we you know, you know that our bottom line really is this. It's not trying to improve our EPS or go have an IPO. Yeah. What we have found is we are getting access not to just good talent, but to the best talent.

People are here for the mission and they're here to work with other people like that. And so the only reason that I could ever see trying to do some type of spin out or a whole owned sub that's is for some reason if if we're not getting the risk capital from the foundations or we can't create a a flywheel of sustainability. Then

maybe certain pieces of it, but I'm very afraid to do that. I mean, definitely wouldn't do that with the mothership because I do see how You know, a lot of good comes I'm I'm a diehard capitalist. My old job was at a hedge fund. A lot of good comes out of market incentives. But I think education and health care in particular, market incentives don't always align with our values. Hm.

So one of the incredible triumphs of Khan Academy has been The millions of of kids who have benefited from it. But in the United States, a huge concern, as you know, and I know you've you've looked at this has been the gap between wealthier kids, um kids who are not as wealthy or who or impoverished.

a gap in in outcomes between Black students and other students. How can something like this Change that in your view. I mean, I don't wanna be too much of a techno optimist here, but I do wanna be optimistic. I mean and I'm sure you are.

they can kind of change that equation. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, some of the stats would shock folks. A majority of minority majority schools. So that's a mouthful, but a majority of minority majority schools

Don't offer courses. Like Algebra two. Physics. et cetera. Not to even mention things like A P courses or I B courses. And so if you're

a young African American student, you don't come from a lot of money You go to one of these schools, you might be Next Albert Einstein. You might be the next Murray Curie, but there's no way that you're going to be able to tap into your potential if your school does not offer algebra to. Or Many times in that algebra two class, because kids are coming from in many cases tough circumstances have gap in their education before that. The teacher kind of

tries to teach to the middle or even to the bottom quartile, saying that that's those are the most severe cases. And once again, that kid who could have been Marie Curie is not going to be able to prepare, prepare themselves. And then when they go to college, they're going to feel inadequate. compared to kids who who had much better preparation. So that was that's always the view of Khan Academy, which is we wanna raise the floor. Yeah. And then we wanna provide as many supports as we can. Mm. But we view Con Migo is kind of in between traditional con Academy And schoolhouse.world, but that's just another layer of support. Uh now, in order to access all of this you still need

Internet access, you still need a device. And that's why we work so closely with school districts. Uh you know, the the technological side in the US has gotten a lot better on over the last ten years. But that's why we're working with school districts to try to get more kids at that level of engagement. Cell, just a broader question about AI

As these products as other AI platforms become better and better. You can imagine a future not Where Things like writing.

Won't actually be that. useful. Like you know, we think of this as a skill. We th we think of great writers as people who've honed their craft, who have talent. But I mean, if these large, you know, language models can absorb everything ever written in human history.

Well You can also imagine that that skill and talent won't be particularly useful in a short period of time. Do you agree with that? That was my initial Thought slash fear slash concern.

The more that I thought about it, and I'm I'm writing a book about all of this right now, so I've been interviewing folks and You know, I interviewed Kevin Roos, who who famously you know New York Times writer, uh who had that famous conversation with uh Bing's Sydney and it was trying to convince him that he didn't love his wife and he loved her and all all of these all of these things. And I asked him that same question and I thought he brought up a very good point. I mean, he's literally a writer and he's like, look, to be a a great writer or journalist There's the writing part of it and then there's the journalism piece of it. And

Sure, AI could help you with a first draft. It can help give you feedback on your writing. But It's gonna take a lot to get to great writing, it might not get quite there, and that whole piece of journalism, like talking to the right people, being creative about how you get your information, connecting the dots. AI is not going to do

Anytime soon. And I think every job has that aspect of it. So I actually think the imperative isn't that oh kids aren't going to learn to write. I'm worried about the the kids that only learn to write Okay. Well to some degree.

they might be empowered by something like AI because now their writing is not going to hold them back in other domains. But anyone in the let's call it the writing Lane. They're going to have to become better. They're gonna have to move into the editorial role to be able to know how to manage.

to create great writing. How do you know that it's that the AI has done a good job and that you can't coach it to be even better? Uh, you won't make someone an editor of a newspaper unless they could be one of the best writers themselves. And I think the people who really leverage AI well are going to be the people who can who can get into that how do you manage the AI, how do you put the pieces together, and and how how do you do the things that AI won't be able to do. So anyone who who has a child, who knows a child that's been in school during the pandemic knows how much education has evolved, right? I mean, m many kids now are now issued laptops in not just in private schools, but also in public schools and so much of the work is done through Google Classroom, right? And parents can interface with it, and it's just a completely different world. Forget about what they're learning, it's how they're learning. But I suspect that what you're talking about with things like Convigo and other AI platforms

What we're about to see is something that is like Going from I don't know, like the Stone Age to the Industrial Revolution. Is that a fair analogy? I think you might be right.

You know, there's a world now where you can you can talk to historical characters and We're probably three to five years away where you could share a room with Benjamin Franklin or Julius Caesar or or Cleopatra. And immerse yourself. It'll it'll be literally the holo deck from Star Trek. I didn't think that was going to happen in my lifetime. I now think that's going to happen in the next five years.

I think for the most part this is positive because the students who are really motivated You know, there's a class of students when they when they were in their math class, and I was in this class of students I imagined how it was describing the universe and I was like, Oh, this is so beautiful, this is so elegant, wow, this is so connected. And that motivated me to go get through some of the grunge and the really hairy equations and all that. But for a lot of kids, they didn't see the the beauty in it. And so they weren't motivated.

But if you're motivated, you can power through anything. Same thing on history. When you just read the history book, like uh this is dull. But if you're like wow, this actually happened to real people and I actually know about it. And could you imagine what it would have been like to be in that moment. When Caesar crossed the Rubicon. You know, what was going through his mind. Then all of a sudden history comes alive and you become incredibly motivated.

I think AI will really help unblock folks as a tutor, but also really help motivate. I mean, imagine having a tutor that not only can do what Aristotle did, but it actually can be Aristotle sometimes. It can role play with you, it can take on tone. That really captivates you.

This all would have been s science fiction a year ago, and it's literally happening now or in the the coming months. It puts to rest the question if you could have dinner with five living or historic people or Who would they be? Because you can actually do it at some point. You can actually do it. Uh you know, having the real dinner will always be better. Uh because we you know, obviously the AIs are they're interpolating or extrapolating from from from so there's there's definitely some imperfections. And but yeah, you're right, in terms of the richness of experience, it's even better than the dinner because

Probably in five years you could put some goggles on and have the dinner actually in Rome in The first century B C E As opposed to at your dinner table. It's amazing. It's absolutely amazing.

Shan, thank you so much. Thanks me, guy. That's Sal Khan, founder and CEO of the Khan Academy. Hey, thanks so much for listening to How I Built This Lab. Please make sure to follow the show wherever you listen on any podcast app. Usually there's just a follow button right at the top, so you don't miss any new episodes and it is entirely free. If you want to contact our team, our email address is H IBT at

ID.wondery.com This episode was produced by Alex Chung with editing by John Isabella. Our audio engineer was Neil Rausch. Our music was composed by Ramteen Arablui. Our production team at How I Built This includes Chris Massini, Carla Esteves, Casey Herman, JC Howard, Liz Metzger, Sam Paulson, Carrie Thompson, and Elaine Coates. Neva Grant is our supervising editor, Beth Donovan is our executive producer. I'm Guy Raz, and you've been listening to how I built this.

What you see above is a preview of the first minutes. One unlock costs 3 credits and covers this episode forever: full segment and word-level timestamps on this page, plus .txt, .srt, .vtt and word-level JSON downloads, as many times as you like.