Transcript

Improving human dignity is an engine of scale, w/Promise CEO Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins

Free .txt

The very best founders I know are brilliant at building systems. They connect teams, they remove bottlenecks, and they eliminate single points of failure. And yet When it comes to their own wealth. Most are running a disconnected stack. A tax accountant here and a state attorney there, a wealth manager who doesn't talk to either one of them.

Creative planning was built to fix exactly that. One integrated team of tax professionals, state planners, investment specialists, all coordinated by a dedicated wealth manager who sees your full financial picture and keeps every piece working together. Proactive tax efficiency, state strategy, investments all under one roof. Creative planning where wealth works together. Learn more at creative planning dot com slash masters of scale.

Global hiring is such a headache when you're building fast, but companies like Eleven Labs are scaling effortlessly with deal. They quadrupled their workforce in twenty twenty five. Without hiring an HR team. Build your global team with deal. Visit deal.com slash MOS and start expanding your business today. That's D E L

dot com. Slash M O S. Hey, folks, Jeff Berman here. I am thrilled to share some of the new names who will be joining us at this year's Masters of Scale summit. This may be our biggest stage yet. Reed Hastings, Meredith Whitaker, Van Jones, Amjad Masad, and more.

Will be there with us October 20th through 22nd in San Francisco. If you're building something great, or you want to build something great, We want you there with us too. Join us at masters of scale dot com slash apply twenty six. That's mastersofscot com slash apply. Twenty six.

There's a famous deaf joke about the lumberjack, it's called Timber. And this lumberjack goes around and he's cutting all of these different trees down. But when the trees fall and the deaf person is telling it They do this mouth morphion, it's a movement with your mouth. Where the tree comes crashing down.

and your cheeks puff up big to show density. So it goes. That's Amber Galloway. She's a sign language interpreter and as hard of hearing herself.

Amber's not actually gonna tell us the punchline. That joke. She uses the lumberjack story to highlight a challenge of her work. As a sign language interpreter. Conveying sound.

Take the sound of a tree. Falling in the forest. So it goes. Right. So your mouth goes really big like that. So I was like, Wait a second

That is just like a kick drum. This discovery led Amber to carve out a specialty as an interpreter who covers Live music. She's got over 500 concerts under her belt, from Lady Gaga and Beyonce to the Rolling Stones and Kendrick Lamar. Amber interprets more than just the lyrics.

She also conveys the instrumentation. Rhythm. and texture of the music. It's a technique she developed because she recognized the need.

Deaf people were being shut out. Of the musical experience. At the time I had a profoundly deaf husband as well as several profoundly deaf people where they don't necessarily hear Anything except the base, right? You're not feeling all of the other parts of the instruments.

So I would talk to my deaf friends about different riffs and they were like, you know, interpreters just do like an air guitar and they'll just point and they're like, can you tell me what that means? And I was like, well, oh how do I explain that? Hamber wanted to help deaf audiences experience music as fully as their hearing counterparts. So she studied the work of great deaf story tellers. I was able to see how they dealt with sounds like the ocean crashing. What their face looked like when the ocean crashed or when a car skid.

and applied it to the actual instruments. To Amber, this work is about more than music. It's about access. to human dignity. The biggest question is always like, why do deaf people go to concerts? But if you think about it from a humanistic approach.

We are more than our ears. When I go to music festivals, I love the smell of the dirt and sweat and beer and perfume and patchouli. I love to see the smiles on people's faces, the awkward dancing. The amazing dancing. The flags waving everywhere.

There's so much more to live events than thinking about what my ears can and can't do. Amber believes so strongly in this mission. That she started her own company. Employing a full team of hearing And deaf interpreters.

In fact, they've created a signed version of this story. For our masters of scale audience. You can find the link to their video in our show notes or at masterscale.com. Amber's secret to growing her career. And her business was putting the dignity of deaf audience members at the center of her process.

Organizing around that principle. was actually a key driver of her success. That's why I believe delivering human dignity to your customers is more than just good practice. It can actually be an engine of scale.

You gotta have incredible talent at every position. It's like this huge push. There are fires burning when you're going out. Such an idiot. And then you go back to this is totally gonna be amazing. There are so many easy ways. I have no idea what to do. Sorry, we made a mistake. But you have to time it right. Oops. It just seems absolutely nutball. Ten years later, I'm like, well, that's just how you do it. We haven't made just how you do it. This is masters of scale. I'm Reed Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn, partner at Craylock.

And your host. And I believe delivering human dignity to your customers is more than just good practice. It can actually be. An engine of scale. Here's a hypothetical.

Let's say there's a new vehicle that gets you to work five times faster than your current commute every time. It's private. It never crashes and it delivers you door to door. The only catch? When you get to the office, you arrive.

Trust. As a chicken. In every meeting. There you are. In your chicken suit.

Leading the all hands, or delivering your presentation. So Would you do it? Your answer probably depends on how much you value your dignity. And

Maybe your company's dress code. For many of us, preserving our dignity. is well worth the extra commute time. But dignity. It's about more than how we feel.

On a given day. It's about how freely We are allowed to move through the world. And it can be taken for granted, especially if you're not used to having your own dignity questioned. If you lose track of dignity as a yardstick for your business's success,

You're missing out on a powerful key metric. And You may be missing. A critical lever. To get to scale.

I wanted to talk to Phaedra Ellis Lamkins about this because as the co-founder and CEO of Promise. Phaedra thinks about our customers' access to dignity. All the time. Promise is a platform. that works with local governments to help the residents settle unpaid bills.

They provide flexible payment options and longer billing cycles. If you've ever been on the losing end of an electric bill you can't pay, You'll know how valuable this optionality can be. Prior to founding promise. Phaedra was a union leader.

A CEO for a Green Jobs Organization. And Brand revenue and operations. For a home healthcare platform. She even pulled off the seemingly impossible.

And helped a music legend gain back the rights to his work. More on that. In a bit. Vedra's entrepreneurial superpower is in taking a contrarian lens to existing systems and seeing where human dignity is lacking.

Phaedra can see which small adjustments to a product can bring huge improvements. She comes by that awareness. Through her own experience growing up.

In a working class family in San Francisco. I went to a school like where you were in the gate program for the gifted kids and all the kids brought their lunch and I didn't because I had free lunch. Then Vader's family experienced a small improvement in income. It had a big impact on our life as an elementary schooler.

Then I went into the 40 cents lunch because we went to reduced. And so the big thing for me was I noticed I no longer had to stand in the free lunch line. So everyone didn't know. I was probably in third grade, and I just knew I didn't want to feel that way anymore. I always thought I want other kids. to not feel the pain and the embarrassment and the shame of having to be in the line. That no one else is in that lets everyone know you can't afford lunch.

The indignity of the free lunch line stayed with Phaedra as a concept as she moved on to high school. College. Then into the professional world. I was really moved by justice. I always wanted to have a sense of justice. So when I was young, I thought that meant being a civil rights lawyer.

Instead. Pedro became a labor leader in the Bay Area in the late nineties. When Silicon Valley. Was on the cusp. Of its first tech boom.

was the center of innovation. And what we were seeing is that people who were receptionist janitors All of a sudden, people began to outsource them. And so engineers became very important, and anyone who wasn't building product became less important. And that meant that people who used to have middle class jobs now had jobs that paid very little. It was increasingly undocumented, folks. And The lack

of humanity as we met with some of these technology companies and said, Hey These are the people who clean your buildings. These are the people who cook for you. And the disconnect between the dignity and work for those folks was shocking to me. Because the essence of technologies was supposed to be liberation, freedom, access to information, and just in your building paying people minimum wage or less than minimum wage. While providing dry cleaning for your workers was shocking and just unacceptable for the type of potential I think that tech has.

It was so not consistent with the theory of technology and scale. Yep, and super important for everybody in the tech industry to pay attention to and try to be part of the solution versus the problem. The Phaedra The disconnect was obvious. These rising tech giants were promising a great democratization of knowledge and access to the world.

So how could they stand for such Inequality. When it came to their own hiring. It was a problem she wanted to understand. Because she believed in technology's potential for scale impact.

I think sometimes if you believe in social change, you're worried about just the individual experience. And so the key mindset for me is the more we scale, the more people get impact. And so I want to drive to impact instead of individual. The fact is technology companies And really most companies are great engines for efficiency and for building. But you have to make sure. You're being efficient at the right thing.

If you're leaving out key stakeholders like your workers, Or your community. It will get harder and harder. to right the ship later on. Vedra believed in a world.

in which technology companies could serve real benefits to the working class. And the poor. But it would take some time to bring that vision to life. After over a decade. As a labor leader.

She spent five years leading the Green Jobs organization, Green for All. The non profit. connected underrepresented communities with the jobs of the future. Deploying technology to improve environmental and economic outcomes.

It was a way. To help close the opportunity gap. In one of the worlds. Fastest growing sectors. But then she got an unexpected opportunity to take a career detour.

And with it. A chance to change a famously entrenched system. Buckle up. Because it's one of the more interesting side quests. We've ever featured on the show.

I worked with prints. That's right, the music artist Prince Rogers Nelson became a client of Phaedra's in 2014. I started working with him around advocacy, actually, which is how to think about integrating music and activism. And through that ended up working with him to get the master's deal that he wanted with Warner Brothers record to really have artistic freedom. If you don't remember this moment.

It was a seismic one for the music industry. Prince had been in a dispute with his music label, Warner Brothers, since the early 90s over artistic control of his master recordings. It was the reason. Prince temporarily retired his name.

In favor of a symbol. But by the time Phaedra got involved in twenty fourteen. the battlefield had shifted. Streaming platforms.

From YouTube to Spotify. had changed the nature of the relationship of artists, labels, and revenue. What changed in streaming is the way that artists were paid changed. And what was interesting is we looked in the record companies owned large portions of the streaming companies. And so it meant that they had changed the economics. So here you had the potential of artist liberation and artist freedom and more people getting access to music.

But it devalued content because it changed the split. It changed the way that people were paid. Once again. Phaedra found herself and her client. At the intersection. Of technology.

And human dignity. Vedra saw that scaling tech platforms Democratized access to music by consumers, but did the opposite. For artists. It was striking to me that you had an artist who is arguably one of the greatest artists of our times.

And he's brilliant and his content was being devalued. It was being heard more, but paid less. And he had less control over it. Here was technology and we'd absolutely no control about the way that music was gonna be heard and delivered.

Pedro had a moment. Of particular clarity. in the middle of negotiations. I was sitting in a meeting with a music exec and they used the word exploitation and they said We want to exploit the music.

And just something went off in my brain. And I was like Oh, you wanna exploit us? And they said No no Phaedra, it's a business term. I'm like, no no.

This is Clarity, you're an exploiter. Get it, and you're putting in the contract, here's how we're gonna exploit your music. So I was like, this is clean, I get it. Yeah. The word exploitation. might have meant one thing in legal ease.

But Phaedra. Zoomed out. to look at the big picture. What she saw there was an arrangement that failed to put any value to On the artist's dignity.

And a system that worked hard to maintain an imbalance of power. I realized I'd been in a room of The most amazing artist in the world, and we were talking about streaming, and it was clear that people didn't understand how it worked. So you needed someone else to explain to you. Which put you at such a disadvantage.

In the end, Phaedra succeeded in helping Prince reclaim ownership of his master recordings. A feat over twenty years in the making. It was a victory. That emboldened and inspired countless other artists. Seeking out their artistic independence from Kanye to Taylor Swift.

After a success with Prince. Phaedra had many professional avenues open. But her heart. remain tied to the mission of giving human dignity to the poor and working class. To do this at scale, she decided she would need to leverage the kind of tech that had changed the music industry.

Which meant She had to become more of a technologist. Herself. What was the path to get into the tech industry? Like what you go, okay, so Tech is possible scale.

We can possibly change the rules of this game. What was the next step? So I thought about going to business school. I sat in a class. And I was like, Okay, I'd just been, you know, managing prints. Like I had done some of the things that people were trying to figure out how to do. I'd made deals, I'd done stuff.

And then it was just like the center of young privilege. So I just was like, oh, this is not my jam. Instead. Phaedra surveyed her network. A great move if you're ever unsure of your next step. I had a friend who introduced me to Mitch and Frida Kapor.

Mitch and Friday Kapor. Are socially responsible investors. They invited Phaedra to meet a few of their portfolio companies. One of them was a home healthcare startup called Honor. Which matches families with caregivers.

And it was a good match for Phaedra. Back in the labor movement. Phaedra had spent years recruiting home care workers to their union. It was rewarding. But painstaking work.

That happened. One worker at a time. Working as an organizer, it was the going from One person Human інтерaction

to actual scaling the experience and I the kind of change I wanted wasn't possible with the one to one human interaction. Vedra knew she wanted to build some sort of platform for good. Focused. Specifically on human dignity. But before she could found a tech startup, it seemed wise to learn how one works.

She met with Seth Sternberg. Honor's co founder and CEO to see if there was a place for her at the company. He knew more than me about technology, but I knew more about the industry that he was doing. I could learn, but I could also teach, which I thought gave me leverage. Counterintuitively. You don't actually have to have a long background in tech.

To lead a tech company. Leadership skills. Can be very transferable. But coming to the tech sector after building a career outside of it. Came with some unique challenges.

Well my challenge started on day one because I came in in heels and a dress. And I was like, what is wrong with all these raggedy people in jeans and a sweatshirt? So one, I just was culturally like weirdos. Just like, what is going on? Men. They were sitting in a room with headphones on, not talking to each other. And I just was like

And I realized, oh, they're slacking? What is going on? Phaedra was experiencing a culture shift that will be familiar to anyone entering a new industry. Or even a new company. That shift in itself is nothing to fear. But what Phaedra noticed at honor.

was that when it came to language and core concepts, the cultural divide went deeper. The most frustrated I've ever been at honor was about the word churn. Churn, of course, is turnover. You can have employee churn. Or customer churn.

And either way. It's a challenge. That's what Phaedra was discussing with her CO. Seth and I were having a debate. I was talking about churn and I was like, Okay, here's what churn means. And he was like, churn is only bad. And I was like, Well

No, here's why people leave. He's like in our world'cause they all got to stay for business call, turn is bad. And I was like, Well Churn technically doesn't just mean bad. And they were like, no, it is only bad. Let's leave aside the substance of the debate itself. Look at the way the conversation about Chern broke down.

Phaedra had one perspective. Seemingly all of her colleagues had another. And because they had all trained in the same programs and had similar work backgrounds, they were in the majority. So they just assumed she was wrong. It's the kind of group think.

That's the product of monoculture. We've talked before about how monoculture can lead to stagnation in a company. And how it can cause great diverse talent. To walk away. But that happens because of the steady drip of conversations that erode dignity.

The experience can feel pretty dehumanizing. The consequences I was like, I'm smart. I am not stupid. You guys don't even know what you're doing. I'm smarter. It's the language stuff, I think, is very hard. And It's it's hard for the person who's used to being smart. Because all of a sudden you don't have the tools.

To talk about what's happening and what you want to have happen. Honor was amazing and miserable at the same time. A company that doesn't solve for the dignity of its employees has a poor chance of solving it for customers. And a great way to correct for that. Isn't truly diverse hiring. In terms of race?

Gender, age. And Past experience. way that people hire people like, how do you get such a diverse team? And I literally am like, How do you not? It's clear that you know going to Stanford, then going to work at Google, then going to business school, then going to McKinsey, it's like that path.

works for so many people, but I think the challenge is you miss so much. For a company to scale. Alignment with your customers. is critical. That means understanding what matters to them.

And delivering it. With deep respect. You will want to. That same standard. For your employees.

Don't leave. Their humanity out of the equation as you grow. Instead, make their dignity. A measure.

Of your success. When you build substantial wealth through your business, it's often tied up in a single equity position. The upside is real, but so is the risk, and knowing when to act isn't always obvious. Creative planning works with business owners to build a strategy around concentrated equity. When to diversify, how to manage tax risk, and how to protect what you've spent years.

Building. Creative planning where wealth works together. Learn more at creative planning dot com slash masters of scale. Hey listeners, Bob here. If you listen to Rapid Response on Masters of Scale, you may be missing half the show. Because every Friday we release a second rapid response exclusively in the Rapid Response feed. The guests and topics are just as compelling and timely from Ford CEO to NASA's administrator to the lessons from The Devil Wears Prada. It takes about

10 seconds to find, just search rapid response wherever you listen to podcasts and hit follow to make sure you never miss an episode. I hope to see you there. Humans will never be more intelligent than AI. There's gonna be two types of companies.

Those were great at AI and those that went out of business because they weren't how do we build a future. That is human centered. I'm Rana El Calyubi. And on my podcast Pioneers of AI, we answer that question and so many more. As an AI scientist, entrepreneur, and investor, I know what it takes to build AI that works for everyone.

Every week, I sit down with the pioneers shaping our future. And we take you behind the scenes of the AI that's transforming our lives. Find pioneers of AI wherever you tune in. We're back. With Phaedra Ellis Lampkins of Promise. If you're enjoying this episode

And wanna share it with friends. hit the share button on your podcast app. Right now. And to hear my full conversation with Phaedra, become a master of scale member. at masterscale dot com.

Slash membership. There are lots of great stories. We didn't have time to cover in this episode. Including The best advice Prince ever gave her.

And a moment. in which Phaedra turns the tables and asks a couple of questions of me. You won't want to miss it. When we left off. Vedra was during her tour of duty at the home care startup.

honor, absorbing everything she could about running a tech firm. After fifteen years in the labor movement, the green economy And a stint as Prince's manager. Phaedra had dreams of leveraging platforms to deliver human dignity to everyone. Not just customers with money.

Three years later, she felt ready to launch a platform of her own. But at first Phaedra didn't know what form the platform would take. Or What it would aim to solve.

Often in a marketplace, the only thing you control is the wages of the worker and pricing. And so technology fundamentally is coming through the middle and saying the value I have is worth something, but the only way you increase value. Is by usually decreasing wages or increasing pricing. And so to me, that model was broken. I tried to think about how could you create a technology company that used the benefit of scale, but that the people who relied on the service did better when the company did better. Phaedr wanted an alternative to a model that constantly pitted company success and customer success against each other. Rather.

She wanted alignment between them. To the customer success. and company success would mean the same thing. You can see examples. of this dignity first approach across the entrepreneurial spectrum.

So they may not use That specific word. Here's Sir Richard Branson talking about the ethos behind building Virgin Airlines. Thirty five years ago when we started it, the big carriers were dreadful. You were lucky if you had a a lump of chicken damped in your lap. And there was no entertainment and very, very surly. Surly crew generally.

And on one of those flights coming to the Virgin Islands, I got bumped, which is sort of typical thing that airlines did in those days. Until I hired a plane and filled it up with all the people who had been bumped and called it Virgin Airlines as a joke. That joke soon became a very real business. and a very real competitor to one of the behemoths of the airline industry, British Airways. What?

BA didn't realise was that actually people like to be entertained, they like to have a wonderful experience, they like to be in a company where the owner takes a interest in all the details, you know, like a private restaurant. The inherent problem with the airlines. was the adversary relationship they'd built with their customers. They had forgotten to put human dignity at the center of the user experience.

Rectify that. and you would automatically become competitive. This kind of aligned success with customers is what Phaedra wanted for a new business. But she wasn't looking. To cater to the jet setting crowd.

Driven by a sense of justice. She wanted a way to ensure best outcomes for people who might not even be able to afford an airplane ticket. So how could she build a product that was both essential and non-exploitative for the type of customers she had in mind. She found a solution.

In an unexpected place. Government. Government is a player who has more resources than almost any other entity and in most places more resources than the consumer. And it actually has an incentive to do well. At the time there was bail reform happening. And what struck me is that two thirds of the people that were incarcerated had not been convicted of the crime they were arrested for. So they're really essentially incarcerated because of poverty.

And so we're like technology could help there. And that was really the idea is could you scale bail reform in a way in which you could figure out how People who couldn't afford their parking ticket were not sitting in jail. Vedra saw her moment of opportunity. Here was a huge intractable problem.

that was finally getting some attention in the Zeitgeist. If she could build a platform that could help people out of jail while awaiting trial. She could deliver access to human dignity at scale. So with her co-founder, Diana Frappier. Vadra created promise.

Promise was built as a gov tech platform. The goal of which Was massive. D Carceration. For people awaiting trial.

promise to offer them an alternative. To posting bail. that would allow them to stay at home. until their trial date. Using this platform, defendants could check in with the system.

Log upcoming court dates. Drug tests. And counselling appointments. All hugely important steps to maintaining one's freedom. Phaedrun or team.

went through Why Commentator. And her investors included a range of human centered venture firms like Kapoor Capital. And when Jay Z and his company Rock Nation invested News of promise went viral. Everything.

was looking like Phaedra's mission was coming true. Then something happened that changed her entire perspective in an instant. I was in the south and a southern state, and I was in this meeting, and I swear it was like duke's a hazard. And there was like this sheriff. Just literally, I just felt like it's movie. And he was bragging about keeping one person in jail pre-trial for a marijuana arrest for seven years.

And so I just thought. This can't be my client. Phaedra. was rightly horrified. At that moment.

This sheriff was her client. And so was the local court system he represented. Fundamentally in technology, I felt in order to do well, you have to be obsessed about the client experience. And then they were bragging about the fact that they wouldn't let their dogs be in these prisons. And

It was shocking to me, and it was an all white room. All the people we saw in jails and prisons were black. And mostly black men. And I just thought technology at his best, especially SaaS software, creates efficiency and improves right margins.

And I just thought if I do something for these people. Even if what I do causes no harm, the impact of them having more efficiency. is harmful. And so I just thought I can't help these people. This is an incredible epiphany to have in the room.

Phaedra wasn't reacting to a breakdown or a platform. Promise had done nothing unethical. But the lens through which she saw her business was the lens. That lens essentially allowed her to

To see into the future. A future of helping corrupt And cruel. Law enforcement agencies. It was not a future she could accept.

And so I just was sitting this meeting and I just walked out. Thank God I had a colleague there. And she stayed, but I just was like oh can't do this, thanks. Like I just I walked out. And I called two of our investors, I called Mitch K. Poor and Bill Trenchard at first round, and I just said Check it out. And I felt good. We had capital in the bank. I could pay everyone back.

it was more successful than most startups that could return some capital. And they both were just very kind and just said no, we invested in you. You were always clear about who you are. You didn't wanna do something harmful and so, you know, go figure it out. I'm actually not surprised.

Pedro got this reaction from her investors. Classically, smart VCs are less concerned with a founder's best idea than than they are with the founder themselves. If the founder is scrappy, observant, can think in contrarian ways. then that's what you're actually investing in.

Phaedra's investors trusted she'd find a suitable pivot. But What? We've been sitting in Oakland County, Michigan, and meeting with judges and they were talking about people who are considered the highest risk to not show up for court are people who have a suspended driver's license. If you don't understand the criminal justice system, you would think

Oh high risk people. Someone who's been accused of murder. Like the system is going to evaluate risk in that way. And But what I realise is that

Losing your license is an entryway into the criminal justice system and most people lose it because of poverty. And so I went back and I said, What happens? Like, how do you lose a driver's license? Parking tickets, driving tickets. not being able to pay child support. And that just seemed insane that we were bringing people into criminal justice system because they were poor. Pedro still wanted to address the problem. of mass incarceration

Her mission didn't change, but she saw a lever she could help pull even earlier. Poor people. out of the criminal justice system. All together. So I went back to Oak, California, in a way that only you do when you've been in technology with hubris and met with the mayor and met with the line instructor, and I was like,

Seems like you have an awful system here. I think we can help you. And the reason is is because at the time If you couldn't afford a parking ticket, You had to wait until it was at least$500 to put it on a payment plan, which means you had to wait until you had additional fees and fines to pay it back. Then you had to come into the office.

And then you had to bring a copy of your taxes and you had to pay interest. So it's like in technology, we were increasingly going to a world where it was buy now, pay later, but for the poorest people who needed the most flexibility, it was come in, show us your taxes, it made it as difficult as possible. Pay attention. to this last point Phaedra just made. The poorest people need the most flexibility. And yet

Consistently receive. Least This is a dignity gap that promise could help solve. And not just for the residents of Oakland. Phaedrill was sure that municipal governments would be motivated to solve this too.

Not only. Would it be politically popular? And The right thing to do. Even from a bottom line standpoint.

When residents pay their outstanding debts. Governments get funded. When residents go to jail Government spend more money. As it turns out, organizing your system around dignity is actually more efficient.

than organizing and around punishment. So the city of Oakland. Jumped at the opportunity. Right? Basically the government was like

No thank you. And then I was like Well, unfortunately for you, we have venture capital. And so we don't need you right now.

Promise made a counterintuitive bet. And charged ahead. They created a website on their own. And put it in front of Oakland residents in debt. We pay people's tickets.

And we let them do interest free installment plans and ninety three percent of people paid us back. And What that showed us. Is that you could give people who couldn't afford a ticket flexibility and they would actually pay it back at a higher rate than all people pay their tickets back.

And so that's how our business was created. Promise challenged the government's assumption that people in debt were untrustworthy. And the proof was in their success rate. A ninety three percent repayment rate was a staggering victory. It showed that Phaedra's contrarian thinking

Was also Completely right. Once promised had proven their concept in the city of Oakland. Other municipalities started catch on. Soon.

Promise was working with cities. Counties. States. and utility companies across the country. It was really the belief that People will pay you back if you make it easy for them, which is what we do for people with good credit. We just don't do it for poor people.

Phaedra's exactly right. Giving poor people. The same access and optionality as people with money. is a matter of basic human dignity. And it's also a lever to scale.

So you begin to say, Okay, now I figure it out. kind of a technology that increases human dignity. that gives more opportunity to You know, these amazingly great and talented people who are otherwise you know kind of systemically disadvantaged. So now you have to start figuring out scale for this. We wanted to figure out how to have a product that had the highest amount of respect and dignity with the least amount of human interaction, which is hard to do.

Wait. Let's play that back. The least amount of human interaction? One really good thing about my training at honor is my revenue perspective, anytime someone called us, we had failed.

And so the real goal for the team was to have no phone calls and no communication. If a product works well. You don't have to call. And you don't have to text, you don't have to chat. That's when the product works. So for me, if we think

That having to ask for help. Means the product is broken. Then that's how we measure success. This is a terrific contrarian and right. Definition of customer success.

Because no one calls the utility bill payment platform to say, hey, everything's going great. Good job. They call when they have a question. A problem. Or a complaint. This very topic came up in my recent conversation with Paul English, the co founder of Kayak.

Paul also believes That if your customers are calling you Your site isn't simple enough. In fact. He so believes it that in the early days of kayak,

The customer service number was his personal cell phone. The funniest call I got was from an older woman who said, You know, I'm trying to get my daughter to come visit me. We're trying to find flights for her. She call me my cell phone. I said, I'm happy to help you.

Where'd you get this phone number? And she said it's on the bulletin board of the senior arm. I said, Have you tried kayak? And she's what's that? I said, It's a website to find flights. And she's Well we don't own a computer. I learned something from the call. Travel can be stressful.

And she wanted her daughter to come visit. And even though she didn't own a computer I tuned my compassion skills during that call. And it made me more compassionate to the next person and made me just Focus on

We gotta make this simple. Like Paul English. Phaedra's team at Promise took careful notes when they got customer calls. And they use these insights to design a more compassionate experience. We thought that treating people with respect and dignity was the secret to them performing better.

And so we just tracked it. The number one thing people called us for were extensions. I need two more weeks. And so then we realized, let's just stop. They don't even need to call and ask us. We're gonna automate the process of extension. You can just do it yourself. And you know what? 90% of people pay within two weeks. So then we were like Cool. You don't need to call and ask us. Everyone gets an extension. It's an automatic thing. What's so smart about this approach is that she is improving the user experience from a quantitative to And qualitative standpoint.

Qualitatively. Granting automatic extensions is a move that's right in line with increasing user dignity. Think about the last time. You needed an extension for something. An extension on a work deadline.

or on a loan from a friend. It can feel bad to ask for more time. No matter the reason. Now think about how great it feels when your professor or your boss or your friend Grants and extension.

Before you even ask. That's the kind of experience. Phaedra wanted to provide her customers at scale. But quantitatively. The case for automatic extensions.

Із чай. It improved repayment rates. While decreasing The frequency of customer service calls. Phaedra could take this data to any local government and say, See, if you grant people an extension,

Instead of penalizing them. Your rate of repayment. Goes up. She's not asking governments to take her word for it. The proof.

Is in the data. And the data. helps the core product improve. The more that we had technology, the cheaper the product could be. And our goal is All of our products right now are interest free.

And so we needed to be able to keep it the cost of operating it as low as possible. And so the way we think about scale is the more people, the cheaper the product, the better the product. But obsessed about the customer experience. Here's another contrarian insight that showed her deep understanding. Of what constitutes dignity. For the customer.

We don't have a app. Everyone's like, oh build an app. I'm like, no one wants a app to pay their bills with us. They they they don't want something using their data, tracking their information. This key insight helped promise build an intuitive plug and play interface with utilities and cities payment portals. The folks we work with are the most overworked, stressed.

Trying to manage a lot, we should bother people as little as possible and make it as easy as possible. That's the goal. This insight shows a deep understanding of Promise's core user. If their users don't want an app. than conventional wisdom around apps. Doesn't matter.

Ultimately, though, promise doesn't want to be the only entity to understand its people. Delivering dignity to users only really works when governments see people Through those same compassionate eyes. But Phaedra has observed signs this is happening. One of our first clients, Louisville Water, forty percent of people were behind. So all of a sudden you have this crisis.

Where you're in the middle of a pandemic, you don't want to shut off people, and forty percent of people are behind. They were like, it would take us ten years to shut everyone off based on our staffing levels. And so you have this perfect kind of crisis. Promise was able to integrate. The Louisville Water Department. And help Louis Villiers. Keep the water flowing during a global health emergency.

It was an obvious win-win. For both the government and the dignity of its people. What was both good and bad about covet is people believed there was a deserving poor. And so People thought people are not working, not because of structural racism and poverty, but because the system no longer works.

And so it meant that there was a space for grace. And I was just like if we don't run through this space We are gonna lose something as a company. Promise did run through the space, COVID pride open. In people's understanding.

And once they did, word spread of their success. Government sells to itself. And once you get one, then it sells to its neighbors and then it sells to someone else. I think what was different for us is that normally in government selling you go to small cities. But because the crisis was in large cities, it meant some of our first clients were large cities.

And I think that's also been really important. Today, Promise is still based out of Oakland. But has been growing steadily in the areas they serve. They just cleared their series B round of funding. And they're looking to build more levers for scale.

They're also benefiting from some external studies that seem to bear out promises claims. There was a study done about our work, MIT's now doing something. And so when there's an external party not paid for by you that says, Ninety percent of people repay this, and we also started getting good at getting aid out, then if there's the economic case for governments, there's a higher customer service rating, not shockingly when people don't have to wait two hours to get through. And someone responds to them kindly, and People perform better.

It may take some contrarian thinking to reorient your company around human dignity. But if you do. It will help you evolve your product. Build out your marketplace. and keep your business innovating for the long haul.

It's the right thing to do. And the right thing to do. For scale. I'm Reed Hoffman.

Thank you for listening. Masters of Scale is a Wakewater original. Our executive producers are June Cohen, Darren Triff, and Jordan Cloud. Our head of content and production is Lori Hoffman. Our producers are Adam Skuse, Catherine Clark Gray, Marie McCoy Thompson, Alex Morris, Tucker Legerski, and Holly Bondi. Our editor at large is Bob Safia.

Our music director is Ryan Holliday. Original Music and Sound Design by Eduardo Rivera. Audio Editing by Keith J. Nelson, Steven Davies, Andrew Naught, and Mike Gallagher. Mixing and Mastering by Brian Pugh. Special thanks to Chris Shay, Elisa Schreiber, Aria Finger. Say it's up yeba, Greg Biato.

Adam Heiner. Colin Howard. Willem Crowell, Pim Cronin. Kelsey Capitano. Sammy A Putta.

Ana Pisano. Sarah Tarter, Lear Sarametis, Charlie Meneses, Chiname Ezequena, Emily Bangmanis, and Mina Kurosawa. Become a member of Masters of Scale to get access to a year's worth of courses and content on the Masters of Scale Courses app. Find out more at masterscale dot com slash membership.