Rapid Response: Ken Burns on Leonardo da Vinci, AI, and the future of storytelling

The very best founders I know are brilliant at building systems. They connect teams, they remove bottlenecks, and they eliminate single points of failure. And yet When it comes to their own wealth. Most are running a disconnected stack. A tax accountant here and a state attorney there, a wealth manager who doesn't talk to either one of them.

Creative planning was built to fix exactly that. One integrated team of tax professionals, state planners, investment specialists, all coordinated by a dedicated wealth manager who sees your full financial picture and keeps every piece working together. Proactive tax efficiency, state strategy, investments all under one roof. Creative planning where wealth works together. Learn more at creative planning dot com slash masters of scale.

Hey folks, Jeff Berman here. I am thrilled to share some of the new names who will be joining us at this year's Masters of Scale summit. This may be our biggest stage yet. Reed Hastings, Meredith Whitaker, Van Jones, Amjad Masad, and more. Will be there with us October 20th through 22nd in San Francisco. If you're building something great, or you want to build something great, We want you there with us too.

Join us at masters of scale dot com slash apply twenty six. That's mastersofscom slash apply. Twenty six. There's all these documentaries and sort of reality things that are being made about a subject, and they're wonderful and very interesting, but you notice that either that person who's the subject or

their wife or their brother or their children are the executive producers. And you go Wait a second, I that could never happen in PBS where I am because we've drawn this Just Absolutely sacrosanct. Church and state line. I can't

have Michael Jordan sitting in my editing room saying Don't use that shot, right? I love that discipline of being true to yourself. And we just Our editing process is where our films are made. When you put it together They're decisions that are made. Millions, no exaggeration.

Millions of decisions. And who makes that decision is super important. You definitely don't want to do the shortcut. You definitely want To see you. What that thing is.

That's the legendary documentarian Ken Burns. Ken has a new project coming out on PBS profiling the life and legacy of Leonardo Da Vinci. And I wanted to ask what leaders today could learn from Da Vinci and how Da Vinci himself might tackle some of the biggest issues of 2024. Ken is part philosopher, part historian, and traces a captivating thread through the past to illuminate key ideas for the future. We talk about the impact of AI on storytelling, the underestimated power of studying humanities, and so much more. It's a rich journey, even if it doesn't run 20 hours like some of Ken's films. So sit back and enjoy.

I'm Bob Safian, and this is rapid response. I'm Bob Safian and I'm here with renowned documentarian Ken Burns. Ken, thanks so much for joining us. My pleasure. Thanks, Bob, for having me. So you've done films about

So many things about baseball and jazz and civil war. Muhammad Ali and Hemingway and Ben Franklin. But your newest doc goes back further in history than any major project you've done before. Focusing on Leonardo Da Vinci

What drew you to Da Vinci? And why now? Well, the why now question is sort of irrelevant for us long term filmmakers because you can work on something for six years and you never sort of say, Oh, well, this is gonna come out in the fall of twenty twenty four and things will be this way or that way, or they won't be any way at all. This is the first non-American topic I've ever undertaken. And and that was quite a difficult place to get. We sort of broke the mold of a kind of traditional grammar in order to be able to contain the multitudes that Leonardo contains and to be sort of stunned perpetually that no matter how distant in the past he may seem to be, he's as modern as anybody we've ever come across. And

If As the cliche goes, you and I are only using ten percent of our brain. He's using seventy five percent. And so it becomes this kind of inspirational go that pulls you along into this world of observation, of experimentation, of discipline, of remembering not to ensilo everything with what both commerce and convenience does, which is put things in different boxes. He's a scientist, he's an artist, he's an innovator, he's an inventor, he's a cartographer, he's a botanist, he's an anatomist, he's Everything.

And he doesn't see the distinction and and I think part of the problem of today among the many, many many problems we suffer from is that We don't have technologists steeped in art. We don't have that many artists who themselves understand that the scientific dynamic is an important one to include. And so we just have to admit that we don't have any Leonardo's and that we can borrow from the past because he's so modern

And inspire our own world with everything that he did. You obviously knew a lot about Da Vinci. Before choosing to do this project, or didn't you? I don't know. I'm curious if there were things that surprised you. You know, I have uh maybe out of 40 films. Maybe two I thought I knew something about, like baseball and uh Vietnam. Each day of those productions were daily humiliations of what I didn't know. And every project is like that. I mean, just let me reverse engineer it for a second and say, if I just tell you what you should know.

Of what I know. The last time I checked that's called homework. But if I share with you my process of discovery. Then we're on a kind of equal footing. The novelist Richard Powers said The best arguments in the world won't change a single person's point of view. The only thing that can do that

Is a good story. In this journey that you went through learning about him, were there particular moments where you're like Mind blown or surprised or I mean I'm sure it happened all the time, but every it's every day, it's every moment. You have this restless mind in which you can say, look at a famous painting like the Mona Lisa, and it's a work of science. Like one of the early admirers of it's just who's talking about her face and then drops down to her neck and says, I can actually see the vessels of her veins. I can see the beating of her heart. And then you can take some of the great works of anatomy and realize that they're works of art as well. And so what Leonardo does among the many thousands of things he does to us, if we let him in, is he asks us To develop all of our parts, to educate all of those aspects of ourselves and to ask really important questions. Where did I come from? Who am I? What is my purpose here? What will I leave behind? Where am I going? And so he though absent a microscope or a telescope.

There's stuff that Leonardo was doing in innovations that we couldn't Actually it didn't mean anything to us about how heart valves worked until we had MRIs and we went. Oh my god, he got it. Right. Or human powered flight. He couldn't do it the materials of the time, but when we did do it four hundred and fifty, four hundred and seventy five years later It's Leonardo's example that we're following, and he's interested in water dynamics and military devices. He draws the first landscape we think in Western art. And so we just tend to like pass him off. We just say Munali's smile, we make jokes, and we pass by

Perhaps The most important person of the last millennium. Is there any way that, you know, or what ways that Leonardo and the way he thought about art and creativity and science That we particularly need to hear In twenty twenty four.

There are myriad ways in which his approach Can be Enlightening, I suppose, but maybe inspiring is it. There's a kind of dedication. And first and foremost is A fundamental trust. in nature. And what nature does is it anchors him in lots of different ways. Spiritually, of course, but also nature is perfect. And we see in nature

all the forms, and he's always looking at the microcosm and the macrocosm. He didn't know about an atom, we didn't know about it then, but he'd be the first today to go, Don't you see there is a profound similarity in the architecture of the atom and the solar system? And so then he's gotta compete for commissions and you know, when he takes the last supper in Milan, it's a huge thing. And the bigger the size of the thing, the bigger the success. But also Every flaw is magnified. And so you've got this tension of competition. You've got all the kind of realities that we have right now. There's nothing different. They're all the same. He's a gay man. He gets locked up, you know, for sodomy, but one of the first inventions he ever does, a machine to pull bars from windows.

The great thing about the Renaissance it is a period in which We've emerged from pandemics, sound familiar? We've emerged from a kind of we call it the dark ages because everybody's a subject. And there's no contact, and all we have is the church and its dogma. And he's working in that.

But now that we're introducing secular humanism into this, we're centering the human being within these stories. And then all of a sudden we're able to think outside the box. So you've got his paintings, his codex is so much uh as you say of what he created, but he lived Much longer ago than your other major subjects, hundreds of years ago. So he predates sort of modern media. No photos, no videos, no contemporaneous recordings. How did that impact what you created? Well, you know, there's no photographs, right? There are no newsreels, but in this case, this new visual grammar, we split the screen. We filmed our own human bodies moving and making gestures. We did some animation. So we it liberated our own style. But having said that, the most important thing is that

There is an arrogance in the present. But somehow because you and I are alive, we somehow know more than them. They're gone. And that that arrogance is the greatest impediment we have to actually evolving in our intellect and in our spirit. And so the Ecclesiastes knew this that's the old Testament.

Thousands of years ago. What has been will be again. What has been done will be done again. There's nothing new under the sun. Human nature doesn't change. So if you get back there and you can figure out a visual grammar to tell the story with paintings and live cinematography, the split screens that we're talking about, you're dealing with the same thing. You mentioned some animation. I I have to ask you about generative AI, which is hitting all industries, including filmmaking, computer generated imagery, obviously. been around for a while in filmmaking, but AI makes recreation easier and cheaper and faster. Did you consider deploying any of that to bring Da Vinci to life?

AI Let me just see, this is rural New Hampshire. Anybody know anything about AI? You know I don't wanna say I'm a Luddite. But I made conscious decisions in my life. I moved here.

Forty five years ago. Because I realized that the kind of work that I was gonna do required a kind of labor intensive, hands on, out of the marketplace sort of thing. When most of my colleagues around nineteen ninety had shifted to computer editing, we waited another decade. And then when most had already long ago abandoned film, we shot film until twenty ten.

Or more. And what I think The best way to say it is that You don't want the technological tail to wag the dog. It has to be controlled in some way. And I'm sure we could feed in, you know, we're having trouble with this scene. We could feed into AI every script that we've ever produced on every film and just say, give us a Ken Burn script for this scene that takes us from I'm working on a history of the American Revolution now, from the battle of Calpens to the Battle of Guildford Courthouse. And you know, it would do it, but

You know, it's like online pornography. What do you really want? You know, you want the real thing. You don't want pornography. At least It seems to me in terms of art.

Or in terms of craft. Except those artists who are playing with it with the intention of disrupting things in a good way. But the dangers right now are are so manifest that you know I'm not sure a shortcut. Is always the best way.

I'm curious, you you've done films about ideas and films about people. Some historians think ideas are more important, others sort of follow this great person theory of history. Uh how do you parse that? Our world today seems very focused on the celebrity of people. Let me just back up a little bit and tell you that In the academic academy. After the World War Two, meaning when we dropped this bomb and we knew Everything was different. We when we discovered that six million Jews had been murdered just systematically.

In Europe. Everything changes, and so there was a sense that narrative was no longer Operative. In music, we're going from swinging To Bebop.

In painting, we're going from representational to abstract expressionism. And so what happens in the academic community, particularly in history, we abandon kind of the bankrupt old narrative because we're in a new place, and we replace it with different fashions of historiography. So we have Freudian interpretations, we have Marxist economic determinist, we have symbolism, we have deconstruction, we have queer studies, we have Afrocentrism, we don't And they're all just A perfectly legitimate way to investigate the subject. But what if you could do all of them? What if you could go back and use narrative, which

nobody can ever abandon. And so what we found in our area is that we can see all those different points of view. And we can include them and some of them are contradictory, and that's okay too, because That's the story of life. You don't have a very simple thing. It's only our superimposition of binary structures. You know what I mean. Male, female, gay, straight, white, black, young, old, rich, poor, Israeli or Palestinian, red state or blue. I mean it's like There's nothing binary in nature, and so these are all just

artificial superimpositions. And so what I think that stories do is permit us the elasticity and the fluidity, no pun intended, of being able to tolerate all of these complex things. And so That's the only way we parse it. We just, you know, I've got a sign in my editing room and it says in cursive, lowercase cursive. In NEON. It's complicated. As you're talking about the complexity, I'm you know, there's a lot of discussion today about

What's fact? and what's misinformation. Yeah. You're making a lot of choices when you're doing your storytelling about what facts to include. How much do you worry that documentarians in the future We'll have a harder time capturing the history being made today because they don't know what to trust. We we we all you have to do is just means test it, right? We just know. And maybe I think what you're implying is that our manipulation of images, whatever AI can do, will somehow get to some place where we can't tell whether

you know, former President Obama actually said this thing or it's some deep fake that made it. But Maybe the question should be more about objective or subjective. There's nothing objective. So The rest of it is subjectivity, but just Shades of subjectivity.

I live in this village, we make maple syrup here. Forty gallons of sap gets one gallon of maple syrup. So That's what we do. The distillation process is in itself a selection, but it's not s necessarily untrue. It's just saying we're selecting this. Then you want to go to the true thing. How much can you tell? And and then it really becomes

Morality. Well, now there's all these documentaries and sort of reality things that are being made about a subject, and they're wonderful and very interesting. But you notice that either that person who's the subject or their wife or their brother or their children are the executive producers. And you go Wait a second, I that could never happen in PBS where I am because we've drawn this.

Just Absolutely sacrosanct. Church and state line. I can't have Michael Jordan sitting in my editing room saying Don't use that shot, right? I love that discipline of being true to yourself. And we just

Our editing process is where our films are made. When you put it together They're decisions that are made. Millions. No exaggeration. Millions of decisions. And who makes that decision is super important. And what you're talking about is that we are now asking

machines, that's basically what we're saying. Two Help us go through it. And that's where I'm saying You know, you can take the interstate from Santa Fe to Taos. Or you can do the high road to Dows.

And I've done that. And You definitely don't want to do the shortcut. You definitely want To see What that thing is.

A lot of technologists talk about AI's power to sift through large amounts of data, but I love Ken's perspective here that the process of sifting through, as arduous as it may be. І соовенурде тру магік лаз. After the break, Ken shares how he stays optimistic in these trying times, the advice he gives to young college graduates, and more. Stay with us. The Wired Newsroom is known for award-winning reporting on how technology shapes our world.

On Wire's Uncanny Valley, we take that curiosity even further. Each week, journalists from Wired break down the biggest stories in tech while speaking directly with the people building, challenging, and reshaping the future. Is the AI boom sustainable? How do you protect your privacy in an age of constant surveillance? Uncanny Valley tackles the questions driving today's tech debates and lighting up your group chats.

Listen to new episodes every Thursday. Wherever you get your podcasts. Humans will never be more intelligent than AI. There's gonna be two types of companies. Those were great at AI and those that went out of business because they weren't. How do we build a future?

That is human centered. I'm Rana El Chayubi. And on my podcast Pioneers of AI, we answer that question and so many more. As an AI scientist, entrepreneur, and investor, I know what it takes to build AI that works for everyone. Every week, I sit down with the pioneers shaping our future. And we take you behind the scenes of the AI that's transforming our lives.

Find pioneers of AI wherever you tune in. Hey listeners, Bob here. If you listen to Rapid Response on Masters of Scale, you may be missing half the show. Because every Friday we release a second Rapid Response exclusively in the Rapid Response feed. The guests and topics are just as compelling and timely from Ford's CEO to NASA's administrator to the lessons from The Devil Wears Prada. It takes about 10 seconds to find, just search rapid response wherever you listen to podcasts and hit follow to make sure you never miss an episode. I hope to see you there.

Before the break, acclaim documentarian Ken Burns shared what inspired him to make a film about Leonardo Da Vinci, and what we could all learn from Da Vinci in 224. Now, Ken talks about how the January 6th insurrection influences his upcoming project about the American Revolution, and why PBS is one of the last remaining antidotes to sensationalist media. Let's get back to it. You're working on this. Project about the American Revolution, like having just gone through the January sixth events, does that change or impact how you're interpreting that chapter? People say history repeats itself.

It never has. There's never been the same event that's happened twice. So Mark Twain is supposed to have said History doesn't repeat itself, but it rhymes. That's about as good as it gets, because that ecclesiastes, human nature doesn't change, means that that human nature superimposes itself on each generation. And we got the same greed and generosity, the same virtue and venality. All of that stuff is before us. And so What you do is you try to see the way human beings act, but focus on your story because you know the second you're done, you lift your head up, and this film is rhyming in the present.

The only film I've ever Ever once changed because of how much it was rhyming as I started many, many years ago in 2015, an entirely different epic. About the Holocaust and As we were working on it, we began to see that

Instead of just rhyming, you we just ignore that while it's happening. It's now rhyming every single second and the alarm bells are going off. If you wanted to be in the most cosmopolitan place on earth in nineteen thirty two. that is to say, where it is leading the world in intellectual rigor. In music, in cinema, in painting, in architecture.

There is no other place on the face of the earth that you would be. Other than Berlin. The next January Thirty three? Not so much.

So the fragility of these seemingly durable structures And institutions is laid bare in a Holocaust. And so we just went through a kind of s a montage in two or three minutes, dizzying montage through the late sixties and seventies and and eighties and nineties, et cetera, up to January sixth. we're reminded just how fragile these things are. But that's it. Other than that one exception of changing the last few minutes of the Holo US and the Holocaust film, have we ever sort of paid attention. It's only after the fact when the film is safely done Then you can sort of start to say, could you could think about it this way. And I could take

Any film, you name it. And I will tell you the way it rhymes in the present. That is just unbelievable. You mentioned PBS and the freedom that the arrangement you have with them allows you to do. You're

You're the face and the name associated with broadcasting for the public good in the US in a lot of ways. Do you worry at all about the future of PBS for like a legacy media organization with a mission of public service? Like What it needs to do now to you know, in twenty twenty four. It's always been changing and innovating. The thing is Bob, it's not sexy, right? I mean I I admit it.

Right. But It's the tortoise in the tortoise in the hare story. The hare just gets tired. It's pooped out by all that bold face underlying celebrity loving bullshit. And I find that having one foot tentatively in the marketplace and the other proudly out. is great. So it's not like You gotta deliver the Vietnam in two years. It's

Okay, ten and a half, you're raising the money, we'll give you a little bit here, ten percent of the budget. You know, just come back and This came out in twenty seventeen, our Vietnam thing. It's ten episodes, it's eighteen hours. Millions, tens of millions of people watched it. It's still like the definitive thing. There's an irony for the audience that listens a lot to this show, which are business people who are

Pushed more and more. Towards metrics. Yes. You know, toward the marketplace. Like that that is a on the Lloyd good. And it sounds like what you're saying is like It's a double edged sword. It's a double-edged. So I'm working on my first film. I look about 12 years old and it's on the Brooklyn Bridge. So people are delighting by the hundreds, literally no exaggeration, by the hundreds delighting in telling me this child is trying to sell me the Brooklyn Bridge. No. And all I wanted was like, a thousand bucks or twelve hundred bucks or two twenty five hundred to just do this film, which I ultimately got made and I used to carry two three ring binders on my desk with all the rejections. But I met along the way the senior vice president at ATT, downtown.

William Sharwell was his name. We became really good friends. I loved him a lot. He was a really good man and he helped gave us twelve thousand five hundred dollars, which was like somebody coming calling me up right now and saying, We're giving you two million, right? It's like it had that what But one day he was like, I got all these MBAs. And They're smart kids. Right.

I could teach you. What I need them to do for me and in the NBA world. But they don't know Humanities. They don't know history. They don't know how to write a letter that's

A page and a half long. They don't know about ethics. They don't know about comparative religion. And so any of these things that are part of the humanities. That we sort of say, Oh, we don't need it. It's STEM. You know, the only way we're gonna get by are those kind of metrics in which one and one equals two. Bridge can't stand. Airplane can't fly unless one and one equals two. Let's just turn out these people who were doing it. What happens? All we want in our lives.

The reason why we're talking. Today is that we want one and one to equal three. We want the whole to be greater than the sum of the parts. And if it's just the sum of the parts, you're stuck there. But if it's here, then you've got this great mystery. What is that difference? Whether it's faith, whether it's love and relationship, whether it's art, Whether it's just humanism or rationalism or whatever it is, you cannot live. You have to stick that A, the arts, into that stem and make it steam. Otherwise

We're just gonna look like another second rate two bit country that is of automatons. You've seen Fritz Lang's metropolis, right? I mean, that's the direction unless you've got people who are going, excuse me, wait a second, please. People who delve into history. Could find things in history that are depressing and could look at the world in the future and be like, oh, it would be better if X or Y happened. You seem to Maintain optimism. Yeah, well I think that's the nature because of if human nature doesn't change, then you see that even in the worst situations we got out of it. I made a film about the Civil War. Seven hundred and fifty thousand Americans were killed by other Americans. Right?

That's a lot of human bodies, right? So It's not to poo poo this. I actually think right now is the greatest crisis. I feel more pessimistic about right now just because. Things in the Civil War that free and fair elections, peaceful transfer of power, independence of the judiciary weren't in question now. All of those things are in question and maybe only because they can be, which is the most decadent kind of idea that this is the ultimate corruption, that we're just flirting with the idea that we invented.

Because we're accepting it. We're accepting accepting building. And when when Thomas Jefferson said we hold these truths to be self evident, they were That's self evident. Nobody on earth could make that argument. Everybody was a subject, and he was saying, No, we're gonna be something else. Now clearly, you know, he owned other human beings. He didn't mean women, he didn't mean the poor, but we The vagueness of the language, we've expanded. And that's been our story. And now you want to flirt with totalitarianism and dictatorship. It doesn't work out.

But Can is there anything that I didn't ask you about that I should have? Well, you know, you were asking about the optimism and it's really there, but to me I I remember once in the nineties Some reporter wrote some feature story and described me as enthusiastic, you know? And it was clearly in the context of the writing pejorative, right? I had fairly thin skin then and I looked up the etymology of enthusiasm. The Greek etymology of enthusiasm is God in us.

So I think we oughta all be pleading guilty to that kind of enthusiasm. That means that your animated Honestly, sincerely by the stuff you're engaged in. And I I always like to say I've got the best job in the country. And the ultimate thing is that Neit you nor me

Nor anyone listening to the sound of our voices. Get out of here alive. And we could understandably be in a fetal position wrapped on the floor, but we don't. We raise children, we write symphonies, tend gardens, and that's the human thing and that's why you have to outrun the machine and let The dog wagged the tail, not the other way around. Well can

Thank you. So much for doing this. My pleasure. Thank you for having me. Coming away from our conversation, Ken had me reflecting on whether I'm enthusiastic in the Greek sense of the word. I'm not openly spiritual in a God in us way, but I love the work I get to do and despite all the hardships around the world, I'm lucky enough to wake up each day motivated to make a difference.

The sweep of history is so vast, it's easy to feel small in comparison, which may be comforting for some. But for me, it's a reminder that we only have one life to leave a positive impact on the world. So let's give it a go, right? I'm Bob Safian. Thanks for listening.

Rapid response is a Wait What original. I'm Bob Safian. Our executive producer is Eve Tro. Our producer is Alex Morris. Assistant producer is Masha Maku Tonina. Mixing and mastering by Aaron Bastanelli. Theme music by Ryan Holiday.

A head of podcast is Lital Malad. For more, visit rapidresponsshow.com.

What you see above is a preview of the first minutes. One unlock costs 3 credits and covers this episode forever: full segment and word-level timestamps on this page, plus .txt, .srt, .vtt and word-level JSON downloads, as many times as you like.